'Mansplaining' museum 労働者 who （刑事）被告 女性（の） 同僚 of sex 差別 over 'angry rant on men' loses 事例／患者
A museum 労働者 who （人命などを）奪う，主張するd a 女性（の） 同僚 的d him with an 'angry rant on men', has lost his sex 差別 事例／患者 after a 裁判官 支配するd his own mansplaining behaviour was to 非難する.?
Jonathan McMurray （人命などを）奪う，主張するd a 女性（の） 同僚 went on an 'angry rant', after he stepped in to 'help' her when she was talking to 訪問者s at the Ulster Folk and 輸送（する） Museum in 2019.
McMurray, a former teacher, （人命などを）奪う，主張するd his 女性（の） 同僚 '開始する，打ち上げるd into a 言葉の tirade' and （刑事）被告 him of 'doing the f***ing bloke thing' when he 介入するd during her guided 小旅行する.?
But a 裁判官 設立する that the 'rant' had not happened as 述べるd and had in fact been 限られた／立憲的な to a muttered 発言／述べる by the 女性（の） coworker 明言する／公表するing 'you are a 苦痛 in the a***'.
McMurray has now lost his?法廷 企て，努力，提案 for 補償（金） after a 裁判官 heard how he would lecture 女性（の） co-労働者s on 'how to 行為／行う their 義務s' and 申し込む／申し出d 'classroom tips' in an 'officious and overbearing manner'.
His line 経営者／支配人 also 公式文書，認めるd how his behaviour had been 'markedly different' when talking to men rather than women'.?
雇用 裁判官 Noel Kelly went on to 解任する Mr McMurray's 主張 of sex 差別 at work, 結論するing: 'If anyone had difficulties 取引，協定ing with the opposite gender, it appears to have been the claimant'.
Jonathan McMurray (pictured) （人命などを）奪う，主張するd a 女性（の） 同僚 went on an 'angry rant', after he stepped in to 'help' her when she was talking to 訪問者s at the Ulster Folk and 輸送（する） Museum in 2019
裁判官 Kelly, sitting in the 産業の 法廷s of Northern Ireland, heard 証拠 that Mr McMurray's 'behaviour' at work 'had been markedly different when he was talking to men rather than women.'
His line 経営者／支配人 公式文書，認めるd that Mr McMurray would speak to 女性（の） staff as though he was trying to 'lecture, 知らせる, advise and educate,' while with men he 'asked questions, left space for them t o speak and didn't 訂正する them.'
In his 判決，裁定, the 裁判官 explained that Mr McMurray had begun working as an education assistant at the Ulster Folk and 輸送（する） Museum in September 2019.
The museum, in Cultra, 郡 負かす／撃墜する, is a living history centre which によれば its website is 献身的な to 'celebrating and 保存するing everyday 技術s, customs and traditions that were passed 負かす／撃墜する over many 世代s in Ulster'.
Mr McMurray's main （民事の）告訴 焦点（を合わせる）d on an 出来事/事件 on 23 October 2019, during which he （人命などを）奪う，主張するd he was 'attacked with no 警告' by a 女性（の） 同僚, who '開始する，打ち上げるd into a 言葉の tirade using abusive 条件 relating to my gender in presence of public and school groups'.
In his 証言，証人／目撃する 声明, Mr McMurray said he had 介入するd to 'help' whilst his 同僚 was talking to 訪問者s and that afterwards, 'she began an angry sounding speech directed against me that （刑事）被告 me of 'doing the f***ing bloke thing, aren't you?' as a rhetorical question and then （人命などを）奪う，主張するing that men were all 有罪の of doing an activity she called 'hosting' that was 不快な／攻撃 to her.
The museum, in Cultra, 郡 負かす／撃墜する, is a living history centre which によれば its website is 献身的な to 'celebrating and 保存するing everyday 技術s, customs and traditions that were passed 負かす／撃墜する over many 世代s in Ulster'
'She （人命などを）奪う，主張するd all men were like this and horrible for that 推論する／理由. She 固執するd for between one to two minutes, 配達するing 悪口雑言 about men which I was too shocked to 吸収する 適切に.
'She 明言する／公表するd that I should never 干渉する with her 配達／演説／出産 or 申し込む／申し出 to 補助装置 her as this was part of that 容認できない behaviour that was the prerogative of men. I asked if she was 存在 attacked, should I 介入する, to which she sneered a reply 'of f***ing course'.
'I was 混乱させるd by the 交流 and 怒り／怒る 表明するd, worried by the トン, 同様に as 感情を害する／違反するd by the way in which it had 焦点（を合わせる）d on my gender and had been 目的（とする）d at me,' he said, 追加するing that the 'rant on men' had been 'very angry and spiteful.'
But the 裁判官 went on to find that the 'rant' had not happened as 述べるd.
Mr McMurray's 女性（の） 同僚s in the education team 'had been irritated by what they had regarded as the claimant's officious and overbearing manner and in particular by...'classroom tips' that he had produced some days earlier, unrequested, to advise them how to 行為／行う their 義務s,' the 裁判官 said.
'The 法廷 also 公式文書，認めるs that he had told his 顧問 psychiatrist...that he does not like working with 女性（の） 同僚s as he finds them to be manipulative.
'If anyone had difficulties 取引，協定ing with the opposite gender, it appears to have been the claimant.
'The claimant's line 経営者／支配人...had noticed that the claimant's behaviour had been markedly different when he was talking to men rather than women.
'She 明言する／公表するd: 'I 観察するd this far more frequently with 女性（の） staff. His conversations with men were very different - he asked questions, left space for them to speak and didn't 訂正する them. It appeared he was making a choice when speaking to 女性（の） staff to lecture, 知らせる, advise and educate.'
'That corresponds to the claimant's own 声明 to his psychiatrist that he did not like working with women.
'The claimant had been unaware of the level of 緊張 and annoyance that he had been creating.
'The 法廷...結論するs that there had been no 言及／関連 to gender and no abusive angry tirade.
'The 法廷 全員一致で 結論するs, in any event, that there had been no gender based 乱用.'
The 法廷 also 解任するd a （人命などを）奪う，主張する that an autistic spectrum disorder which Mr McMurray was 診断するd with after 辞職するing from his 職業 at the museum in October 2020 should have been spotted by his 雇用者s and 行為／法令／行動するd upon.
'The （人命などを）奪う，主張する of 建設的な 不公平な 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 must fail,' the 裁判官 結論するd.
